I was surfing Hulu recently for something interesting
to watch and happened upon FREQUENCIES,
a film the description indicated is a "science fiction romance." Initially,
it was the poster that caught my eye. The image depicts male and female hands
reaching toward each other and so promised romance, or at least a
character-driven and relationship-focused story. I was like, "Cool, a new
SFR film!" I was only a little surprised I hadn't heard about it before,
but after all, the world is a big place. And I loved the sense of discovery
that came with learning about a new-to-me film.
I began watching it. Then, at one point, a character
wrote the letters "OXV" on a blackboard. That's when I realized I had heard about this film—that is to
say, when it had another title.
This film had originally been titled OXV: THE MANUAL,
and I had shared it on TGE a
couple years ago. Thank goodness for streaming technology
or it might have been even longer before I watched it.
Someone, probably the distributor, had decided to
change the name. I'm not sure how well it works given that "OXV" ties
very specifically into the plot. Perhaps they thought "OXV" in the
title would give something away? Difficult to say. I personally like the
original title better, but I can understand how "frequencies" is less
cryptic.
FREQUENCIES was directed by Darren Paul Fisher.
It stars Daniel Fraser, Eleanor Wyld, and Owen Pugh. An independent British
film, it released in 2013. Here's the basic premise:
In a world where relationship, connections, and life worth is determined by predestined "frequencies", Isaac-Newton Midgeley, known as Zak, is a low born that attempts to change his fate by attempting to start a relationship with high born savant, Marie-Curie Fortune.
It's interesting how the recent-ish batch of sci-fi
romances I've watched either fall into the comedic category (e.g., SAFETY
NOT GUARANTEED) or the cerebral (e.g., FREQUENCIES, PERFECT
SENSE), or a mixture of both (THE ONE I LOVE). It
makes sense given the limitations of low-budget films, but I still would like
to watch a wider variety.
I regret to report that FREQUENCIES was a
"meh" viewing experience for me. It wasn't completely boring, but despite
its earnestness, it lacked heart. If you're interested in checking it out, but
would like a bit more information about what to expect, here are my
stream-of-consciousness tags and impressions of the film (no spoilers):
* low fi sci-fi, contemporary/dystopian setting
* philosophical and cerebral approach
* serious tone
* explores fated mate theme
* forbidden romance; hero and heroine meet-cute as
kids; little basis established for romance
* for music lovers, the story includes a musical
thematic motif
* muddy science—there's an attempt to present profound
concepts, but the presentation felt fractured
* intriguing worldbuilding, but at times it's unclear/underdeveloped
* decent, earnest acting
* "sweet" heat level
* low conflict level
* includes sinister "Men in Black" agency
I wasn't sorry I saw FREQUENCIES, but I'm sorry I
didn't enjoy it as much as I'd hoped. Part of that is because it seemed to me the
story veered toward SFR being a means to explore certain themes rather than the
central point. So I had difficulty fully engaging with the romance as a result.
Independent films are difficult enough to do, let
alone do really well, so I usually give them the benefit of the doubt. In that
sense, FREQUENCIES is worth watching if you can see it for free or through a
streaming subscription. And if Darren Paul Fisher does another SFR film, I'd
definitely check it out.
Joyfully yours,
Heather